A Curved Solar Mirror: the Line That Grazes It and the Strut Bolted at Right Angles to It
The cross-section of a curved solar mirror is the curve y = x28, with x and y in meters and the axis of the mirror along the line x = 0. A strut is to be bolted to the mirror at the point where x = 2, standing at right angles to the surface. (a) Find the equation of the tangent to the mirror at that point. (b) Find the equation of the normal there, and the height at which it crosses the axis of the mirror.
The tangent is the line that grazes the mirror at the point of contact, and its gradient is the derivative there. The strut stands at right angles to the surface, so it lies along the normal, whose gradient is the negative reciprocal of the tangent's.
- The point of contact lies on the curve, so put x = 2 into y = x28: y = 48 = 0.5. The strut is bolted at the point (2, 0.5).
- Differentiate for the gradient at any point on the mirror: dydx = 2x8 = x4.
- At x = 2 the gradient is 24 = 0.5. That is the gradient of the tangent, the line that grazes the mirror there.
- (a) Write the tangent through (2, 0.5) with gradient 0.5: y − 0.5 = 0.5(x − 2), which tidies to y = 0.5x − 0.5.
- The strut is at right angles to the tangent, so its gradient is the negative reciprocal: −10.5 = −2. Check: 0.5 × (−2) = −1, as two perpendicular gradients must.
- (b) Write the normal through (2, 0.5) with gradient −2: y − 0.5 = −2(x − 2), which tidies to y = 4.5 − 2x. Putting x = 0 gives y = 4.5, so the strut's line crosses the axis 4.5 m above the bottom of the mirror.
answer(a) y = 0.5x − 0.5; (b) the normal has gradient −2 and equation y = 4.5 − 2x, crossing the axis at a height of 4.5 m
techniqueTangents and Normals to Curves
Common pitfalls
- Taking the gradient of the normal to be −0.5 because the tangent's gradient is 0.5. The negative reciprocal turns the number over as well as changing its sign, so it is −2; the check is that the two gradients multiply to −1, and 0.5 × (−0.5) = −0.25.
- Writing the tangent as y = 0.5x from the gradient alone. A line needs a point as well as a gradient, and through (2, 0.5) the intercept is −0.5: the line y = 0.5x passes above the mirror and never touches it.
A Square Base Marked Out on Site: a Square Root Read off the Tangent, and How Far Out It Falls
A square concrete base for a water tank must cover exactly 101 square meters, so its side is √101 meters. The foreman on site has no calculator, only the fact that √100 = 10. (a) Use the tangent to y = √x at x = 100 to estimate the side. (b) Square the estimate as a rough check, and then say how far it falls from the exact side, which is 10.049876 m to six decimal places.
Close to the point of contact a curve and its tangent are almost the same line, so a value of the function nearby can be read off the tangent instead. The gradient at the known point says how much the root changes for each unit of x.
- Let f(x) = √x. The nearest value whose root is known is x = 100, where f(100) = 10.
- Differentiate. Written as a power, f(x) = x0.5, so dydx = 12√x, and at x = 100 that is 12 × 10 = 0.05.
- Near the point of contact the curve and the tangent almost agree, so f(100 + h) ≈ f(100) + 0.05h. Here the step is h = 1.
- (a) The estimate is 10 + 0.05 × 1 = 10.05 m.
- Square it as a rough check: 10.052 = 101.0025 square meters, which is 0.0025 more than the 101 wanted. The estimate is a little too long.
- (b) The exact side is 10.049876 m, so the estimate is out by 10.05 − 10.049876 = 0.000124 m, about a tenth of a millimeter. It comes out too long because √x bends downwards and the tangent lies above the curve on both sides of the point.
answer(a) about 10.05 m; (b) the estimate is 0.000124 m too long, about 0.12 mm
techniqueThe Tangent-Line Approximation · Tangents and Normals to Curves
Common pitfalls
- Estimating √101 as 10.1 because 101 is one more than 100. The root does not grow at the same rate as the number: near 100 the gradient is only 0.05, so one unit of x raises the root by about 0.05, not by 1.
- Building the tangent at a point far from 101, such as x = 121. The approximation is only good near the point of contact, and from 121 the same method gives 11 − 2022 ≈ 10.0909, which is out by about 0.04 m instead of a tenth of a millimeter.
Two Average-Speed Cameras on a Motorway: the Instant a Van Was Doing Exactly the Average
Two cameras stand 12 km apart on a motorway. A van passes the first and reaches the second 8 minutes later. Its distance past the first camera is s = m + 0.0625m2 km, where m is the number of minutes since it passed. (a) Find the van's average speed between the cameras, in kilometers per hour. (b) The mean value theorem says that at some instant between the cameras the van was traveling at exactly that speed. Find that instant.
The cameras measure only a distance and a time, which together give an average speed. The mean value theorem turns that average into a statement about one instant: for a smooth journey, some moment has the speedometer reading exactly the average, and that moment is found by setting the derivative equal to it.
- Check the two ends. At m = 0 the van is at the first camera, s = 0; at m = 8, s = 8 + 0.0625 × 64 = 8 + 4 = 12 km, the second camera.
- (a) The average speed is the distance divided by the time: 128 = 1.5 km a minute. In an hour that is 1.5 × 60 = 90, so the average speed is 90 km/h.
- The distance is a smooth function of the time, so the mean value theorem applies: somewhere strictly between the cameras the derivative equals the gradient of the chord, and that gradient is the average of 1.5 km a minute.
- Differentiate for the speed at any instant: dsdm = 1 + 0.125m km a minute.
- Set that equal to the average: 1 + 0.125m = 1.5, so 0.125m = 0.5 and m = 4.
- (b) Four minutes after the first camera the van was traveling at exactly 1.5 km a minute, which is 90 km/h. Check: it passed the first camera at 1 km a minute (60 km/h) and the second at 2 km a minute (120 km/h), so it went through 1.5 on the way.
answer(a) 90 km/h, which is 1.5 km a minute; (b) 4 minutes after the first camera
techniqueThe Mean Value Theorem · Motion in a Straight Line
examsO-Level
Common pitfalls
- Dividing 12 by 8 and calling the answer 1.5 km/h. The time is in minutes, so 1.5 is kilometers a minute; it must be multiplied by 60 to give the 90 km/h the two cameras report.
- Reading the theorem as saying the van held that speed all the way. It names one instant only: this van was traveling at 60 km/h as it passed the first camera and 120 km/h at the second, and matched 90 km/h exactly once, after 4 minutes.
A Bottling Machine's Waste Against Its Setting: a Stationary Point the Second Derivative Cannot Judge
A bottling machine wastes W = 5 + (x − 12)41296 kilograms of glass an hour when its filling head is at setting x, for 6 ≤ x ≤ 18. (a) Over which settings is the waste falling, and over which is it rising? (b) Find the setting that wastes least, and show why the second derivative cannot settle it.
The sign of the derivative says which way a quantity is heading: negative for falling, positive for rising. At the stationary point here the second derivative comes out zero and decides nothing, so the change of sign in the first derivative is what names the minimum.
- Differentiate: dWdx = 4(x − 12)31296 = (x − 12)3324 kilograms an hour for each unit of setting.
- A cube keeps the sign of what is cubed. For x < 12 the bracket x − 12 is negative, so dWdx is negative; for x > 12 it is positive.
- (a) So the waste falls over the settings from 6 to 12 and rises over the settings from 12 to 18.
- The only stationary point is where dWdx = 0, and a cube is zero only when its bracket is, so x = 12.
- Differentiate again: d2Wdx2 = 3(x − 12)2324 = (x − 12)2108. At x = 12 this is zero, and a second derivative of zero decides nothing: it leaves a maximum, a minimum and a point of inflection all still possible.
- (b) The first-derivative test settles it. The gradient is negative just before x = 12 and positive just after, so the curve turns from falling to rising: setting 12 is a minimum, wasting W = 5 kilograms an hour. Check: settings 6 and 18 each waste 5 + 12961296 = 6 kilograms an hour, which is more.
answer(a) the waste falls from setting 6 to setting 12 and rises from setting 12 to setting 18; (b) setting 12, wasting 5 kilograms an hour
techniqueThe First Derivative Test · Increasing and Decreasing Functions · Critical Points and Local Extrema
examsH2
Common pitfalls
- Calling x = 12 a point of inflection because d2Wdx2 = 0 there. A zero second derivative is needed for a point of inflection but is not enough on its own: the second derivative must also change sign, and (x − 12)2108 is positive on both sides of 12.
- Testing only the ends of the range and reporting setting 6 as the best. Setting 6 wastes 6 kilograms an hour, while the least waste is at the stationary point x = 12, which lies inside the range.
Three Beds for a Market Garden Beside a Canal: the Shape That Encloses the Most Ground
A market garden is to be fenced against a straight canal, which needs no fence of its own. The plot is a rectangle divided into three equal beds by two fences running from the canal to the far side, and there are 240 m of fencing in all. Let x meters be the distance from the canal to the far side. (a) Find the dimensions that enclose the greatest area. (b) Find that greatest area, and confirm that it is a maximum.
The fencing is fixed, so the two lengths are tied together; that relation turns the area into a function of one length alone. Setting its derivative to zero gives the stationary point, and the sign of the second derivative says whether it is the greatest area or the least.
- Count the fences. Four of them run from the canal to the far side — the two ends and the two partitions — and each is x meters long. One runs along the far side, parallel to the canal; call it y meters. So 4x + y = 240.
- Make the area a function of x alone. From the fencing, y = 240 − 4x, so A = xy = x(240 − 4x) = 240x − 4x2 square meters.
- Differentiate and set the result to zero: dAdx = 240 − 8x = 0, so x = 30.
- (a) Then y = 240 − 4 × 30 = 120, so the plot is 30 m from the canal and 120 m along it. Check the fencing: 4 × 30 + 120 = 240 m, all of it used.
- Differentiate again: d2Adx2 = −8. It is negative, so the curve bends downwards everywhere and the stationary point is a maximum, not a minimum.
- (b) The greatest area is 30 × 120 = 3600 square meters. Check: x = 29 gives 29 × 124 = 3596 and x = 31 gives 31 × 116 = 3596, both smaller.
answer(a) 30 m from the canal by 120 m along it; (b) 3600 square meters, a maximum because d2Adx2 = −8 is negative
techniqueThe Second Derivative Test · Optimization Problems · Finding Stationary Points
Common pitfalls
- Writing the fencing as 2x + 2y = 240, the perimeter of a plain rectangle. The canal replaces one of the long sides and the two partitions add two more short ones, so what is paid for is four lengths of x and one of y.
- Stopping at dAdx = 0 and calling x = 30 a maximum because the question asks for one. The second derivative has to be looked at: here d2Adx2 = −8, which is negative, so the stationary point really does give the greatest area.
A Delivery Van Held Between Two Speeds: the Best Speed and the Worst in the Allowed Range
A delivery van uses F = 14 − 0.2v + 0.00125v2 liters of fuel per 100 km when it is driven at a steady v km/h. On its route the van may not go slower than 60 km/h nor faster than 120 km/h. (a) Find the speed that uses least fuel, and how much it uses. (b) Find the speed that uses most fuel over the allowed range, and how much it uses there.
On a closed interval the greatest and least values are either at a stationary point inside it or at one of its two ends. Both ends must therefore be worked out and compared with the stationary point, because at an end the derivative need not be zero.
- Differentiate: dFdv = −0.2 + 0.0025v liters per 100 km for each km/h.
- Set it to zero for the stationary point: −0.2 + 0.0025v = 0, so v = 80, which lies inside the allowed range.
- (a) At v = 80, F = 14 − 16 + 0.00125 × 6400 = 14 − 16 + 8 = 6 liters per 100 km. Here d2Fdv2 = 0.0025 is positive, so this stationary point is a minimum, and it is the least fuel the van can use.
- Now work out both ends. At v = 60, F = 14 − 12 + 0.00125 × 3600 = 14 − 12 + 4.5 = 6.5; at v = 120, F = 14 − 24 + 0.00125 × 14400 = 14 − 24 + 18 = 8.
- Compare the three values: 6 liters at 80 km/h, 6.5 liters at 60 km/h and 8 liters at 120 km/h.
- (b) The most fuel is used at 120 km/h, at 8 liters per 100 km. The gradient there is −0.2 + 0.3 = 0.1, which is not zero: the interval simply stops before the curve does, so the greatest value sits at an end.
answer(a) 80 km/h, using 6 liters per 100 km; (b) 120 km/h, using 8 liters per 100 km
techniqueAbsolute Extrema on a Closed Interval · Critical Points and Local Extrema · Finding Stationary Points
examsO-Level
Common pitfalls
- Solving dFdv = 0 and offering that one speed as both the best and the worst. A stationary point gives only a local turning value; on a closed interval the two ends have to be compared with it, and here the greatest value is at an end.
- Reading F as the fuel for the whole journey. It is liters per 100 km, so a longer route uses more fuel at every speed, while the speed that uses least stays 80 km/h.
An Outbreak's Case Numbers: the Day the New Cases Stop Climbing
In an outbreak, the total number of cases x days after the first is N = 60x2 − 2x3, for 0 ≤ x ≤ 20. (a) Find the day on which new cases are appearing fastest, and the rate at which they appear then. (b) Find the total on that day, and say what the curve of totals is doing there.
The new cases in a day are the rate at which the total grows, so they are the first derivative. That rate peaks where its own derivative is zero, which is where the curve of totals changes from bending upwards to bending downwards: a point of inflection.
- The new cases in a day are the rate at which the total grows: dNdx = 120x − 6x2 cases a day.
- That rate is greatest where its own derivative is zero, so differentiate once more: d2Ndx2 = 120 − 12x.
- Set it to zero: 120 − 12x = 0, so x = 10.
- Check that the bend changes sides. For x < 10, 120 − 12x is positive and the curve of totals bends upwards; for x > 10 it is negative and the curve bends downwards. So x = 10 really is a point of inflection.
- (a) The new cases peak on day 10, at dNdx = 1200 − 600 = 600 new cases. Check: day 9 gives 1080 − 486 = 594 and day 11 gives 1320 − 726 = 594, both fewer.
- (b) The total that day is N = 6000 − 2000 = 4000 cases. The outbreak is still growing, but from day 10 onwards it grows by less each day than the day before: that is what the change of bend means, and by day 20 the total has settled at 8000.
answer(a) day 10, when new cases are appearing at 600 a day; (b) 4000 cases in total, where the curve stops bending upwards and starts bending downwards
techniquePoints of Inflection · Curve Sketching with Derivatives
Common pitfalls
- Setting dNdx = 0 to find the peak. That gives the day the total stops rising, day 20, when the outbreak is over. The peak in NEW cases is a maximum of the first derivative, so it is the second derivative that is set to zero.
- Calling day 10 the halfway point of the outbreak because 4000 is half of 8000. That the two agree is a feature of this particular curve; the day the bend changes is found from d2Ndx2 = 0, not by halving the final total.
A Cylindrical Can of Fixed Capacity: the Shape That Uses the Least Metal
A closed cylindrical can is to hold 128π cubic centimeters, which is about 402 milliliters. Its surface is the curved side together with two circular ends, so the metal used is A = 2π r2 + 2π rh square centimeters, where r cm is the radius and h cm the height. (a) Find the radius and the height that use the least metal. (b) Find that least area, and say how the height compares with the radius.
The area depends on two lengths, but the capacity ties them together, so one can be written in terms of the other. Once the area is a function of the radius alone it can be differentiated, and the stationary point gives the can that uses least metal.
- Use the capacity to remove one of the two letters. The volume is π r2 h = 128π, so h = 128r2.
- Put that into the area: A = 2π r2 + 2π r × 128r2 = 2π r2 + 256πr, which is a function of r alone.
- Differentiate: dAdr = 4π r − 256πr2.
- Set it to zero: 4π r = 256πr2, so 4r3 = 256 and r3 = 64, giving r = 4 cm. A radius cannot be negative, and r3 = 64 has only this one real root, so there is nothing to reject.
- (a) Then h = 12816 = 8 cm. Check the capacity: π × 16 × 8 = 128π cubic centimeters, as the can must hold.
- (b) The least metal is A = 2π × 16 + 256π4 = 32π + 64π = 96π ≈ 301.6 square centimeters. Since d2Adr2 = 4π + 512πr3 = 12π is positive, this is a minimum, and h = 8 = 2r: the best can is exactly as tall as it is wide.
answer(a) radius 4 cm and height 8 cm; (b) 96π ≈ 301.6 square centimeters, with the height twice the radius
techniqueOptimization Problems · The Second Derivative Test · Finding Stationary Points
Common pitfalls
- Differentiating A = 2π r2 + 2π rh with respect to r while treating h as a constant. The height is not free to stay where it is: the capacity ties it to the radius, so it must be replaced by 128r2 before the area is differentiated.
- Leaving out one of the ends and using A = π r2 + 2π rh. That is an open can, and it leads to r3 = 128 and a radius of about 5.04 cm: a different can with a different answer.
A Fairground Carriage on a Curved Rail: Its Speed, and the Steepness of the Rail Beneath It
A fairground carriage climbs a curved rail. After m seconds it is x = 3m meters out from the start and y = 2m2 meters above it, for 0 ≤ m ≤ 2. (a) Find the speed of the carriage after 1 second. (b) Find the gradient of the rail at that point, and check it against the equation of the rail itself.
The two coordinates are each given in terms of the time, so each has its own rate. The two rates are at right angles, so the speed comes from Pythagoras' theorem, while dividing one by the other gives the gradient of the path the carriage is on.
- Differentiate each coordinate with respect to the time: dxdm = 3 meters a second out from the start, and dydm = 4m meters a second upwards.
- After 1 second the carriage is moving 3 meters a second out and 4 meters a second up, and it is at the point x = 3, y = 2.
- (a) The two rates are at right angles, so Pythagoras' theorem gives the speed: √32 + 42 = √25 = 5 meters a second.
- For the steepness of the rail, divide the upward rate by the rate out from the start: dydx = dydm ÷ dxdm = 4m3.
- (b) After 1 second that gradient is 43, or about 1.333: the rail rises 4 m for every 3 m out.
- Check it against the rail itself. From x = 3m comes m = x3, so y = 2 × x29 = 2x29 and dydx = 4x9. At x = 3 that is 129 = 43, the same gradient by a second route.
answer(a) 5 meters a second; (b) a gradient of 43, about 1.333
techniqueParametric Differentiation · Parametric Equations · Related Rates
examsH2
Common pitfalls
- Adding the two rates for the speed: 3 + 4 = 7 meters a second. The rates are at right angles, so they combine by Pythagoras' theorem rather than by addition, and the speed is 5 meters a second.
- Differentiating y = 2m2 to get 4m and calling that the gradient of the rail. It is the rate the height grows with TIME; the gradient is the height gained for each meter traveled out, so dydm must be divided by dxdm.
A Pendulum Drawn Aside Through a Small Angle: How Far the Bob Rises, from a Series
A pendulum 2 meters long is drawn aside until its string makes an angle of x = 0.2 radians with the vertical. The bob then rises h = 2(1 − cos x) meters. (a) Write the Maclaurin series for cos x as far as the term in x4, and use it to estimate cos 0.2. (b) Find how far the bob rises, and say how far out the two-term estimate 1 − x22 would leave it.
A Maclaurin series rebuilds a function from its derivatives at zero, and for a small angle the first few terms already give a very close value. Taking one term more and comparing the two answers shows how much the extra term is worth.
- Differentiate the cosine at zero, one order at a time: cos 0 = 1, then −sin 0 = 0, then −cos 0 = −1, then sin 0 = 0, then cos 0 = 1. Divide each by the factorial of its order to get the coefficients.
- (a) So cos x ≈ 1 − x22 + x424, every odd term vanishing. At x = 0.2: 1 − 0.02 + 0.001624 = 1 − 0.02 + 0.0000667 = 0.980067 to six decimal places.
- Put that into the height: h = 2(1 − 0.980067) = 2 × 0.019933 = 0.039867 m.
- (b) So the bob rises about 39.87 mm.
- Now stop the series at two terms: cos 0.2 ≈ 1 − 0.02 = 0.98, which gives h = 2 × 0.02 = 0.04 m, or 40 mm.
- The two-term estimate is therefore 40 − 39.87 = 0.13 mm too high. Check: the term left out is x424 = 0.0000667, and 2 × 0.0000667 = 0.000133 m, which is that 0.13 mm.
answer(a) cos 0.2 ≈ 0.980067; (b) the bob rises about 39.87 mm, and the two-term estimate leaves it 0.13 mm too high
techniqueMaclaurin Series · The Tangent-Line Approximation
examsH2
Common pitfalls
- Reading 0.2 as a measure in degrees. The series is built from the derivatives of cos x with x in radians, and at 0.2 degrees the bob would rise only about 0.012 mm, out by a factor of more than three thousand.
- Keeping only the first term, cos x ≈ 1. That gives h = 0 and says the bob does not rise at all; the series needs the x2 term before it says anything about the height.
A Timing Circuit's Capacitor Charging from Empty: the Mean Current over a First Instant Too Short to Time
A 2000-microfarad capacitor in a timing circuit is charged from a 9-volt battery through a 500-ohm resistor. It starts empty, and n seconds after the switch is closed the charge on it is Q = 0.018(1 − e−n) coulombs, so the mean current over those first n seconds is I = 0.018(1 − e−n)n amperes. That formula cannot be worked out at n = 0. (a) Find the limit of I as n tends to 0, in milliamperes, and check it against the current Ohm's law gives while the capacitor is still empty. (b) Find the limit, as n tends to 0, of 0.018 − In, in amperes per second, and use it to estimate the mean current over the first 0.1 seconds, in milliamperes.
The mean current over an interval that shrinks to nothing is the current at the instant the switch closes, which the circuit certainly has, but the formula turns into zero over zero there. L'Hôpital's rule settles such a limit: when the top and the bottom both tend to zero, the limit of their ratio is the limit of the ratio of their derivatives.
- Put n = 0 into I = 0.018(1 − e−n)n: the top is 0.018(1 − 1) = 0 and the bottom is 0. The formula gives 00, which decides nothing, so the limit has to be found another way.
- Both top and bottom tend to zero, so L'Hôpital's rule applies. Differentiate each separately: the top gives 0.018e−n and the bottom gives 1. So limn → 0 I = 0.018e01 = 0.018 A.
- (a) The mean current closes in on 0.018 A, which is 18 mA. Check: while the capacitor is empty there is no voltage across it, so the whole 9 V lies across the resistor and Ohm's law gives 9500 = 0.018 A.
- For (b), write the fraction over one line: 0.018 − In = 0.018n − 0.018(1 − e−n)n2 = 0.018(n − 1 + e−n)n2. At n = 0 the top is 0.018(0 − 1 + 1) = 0 and the bottom is 0. Differentiating both gives 0.018(1 − e−n)2n, which is still 00 at n = 0, so differentiate both again: 0.018e−n2, which tends to 0.0182 = 0.009.
- (b) The limit is 0.009 amperes a second, or 9 mA a second, so over a short first interval of n seconds the mean current is about 18 − 9n mA. For the first 0.1 seconds that is 18 − 0.9 = 17.1 mA. Check: the formula itself gives 0.018(1 − e−0.1)0.1 = 0.18 × 0.09516 = 0.01713 A, which is 17.13 mA.
answer(a) 18 mA, the same as the 9500 = 0.018 A Ohm's law gives for the empty capacitor; (b) the limit is 0.009 amperes a second, so the mean current over the first 0.1 seconds is about 18 − 0.9 = 17.1 mA (the formula gives 17.13 mA)
techniqueL'Hôpital's Rule · Indeterminate Forms
Common pitfalls
- Differentiating the whole fraction by the quotient rule. L'Hôpital's rule differentiates the top and the bottom each on its own; the quotient rule gives the derivative of I, a different quantity, and at n = 0 it is itself zero over zero.
- Stopping after one round in (b). One differentiation leaves 0.018(1 − e−n)2n, which is still zero over zero at n = 0 and so has no value there yet; the rule is applied again until the bottom no longer tends to zero.