Where the second derivative goes silent
On the gradient is and the second derivative is . At x = 0 both are 0. The origin is a stationary point, and the second derivative test says nothing about it.
The gradient itself still speaks. At x = −0.5 it is 4 × (−0.125) = −0.5, and at x = 0.5 it is 0.5. The curve is falling before the origin and rising after it, so the origin is a trough, a local minimum.
A pause, not a turn
On the gradient is . It is 0 at x = 0, and 3 at both x = −1 and x = 1; in fact is positive for every x except 0. Walking left to right, the sign of the gradient runs +, 0, +.
So the curve climbs up to the origin, levels off for an instant, and climbs on. There is no peak and no trough. A stationary point like this, where the curve does not turn, is a stationary point of inflection.
The test
Let c be a critical point of f, with f continuous at c. Look at the sign of f' just before c and just after it.
If f' changes from positive to negative, f has a local maximum at c. If it changes from negative to positive, f has a local minimum at c. If the sign is the same on both sides, f has neither.
The reason is what the sign of f' means. Where f' is positive on an interval, f is increasing there; where it is negative, f is decreasing. If f' is positive just before c and negative just after, f rises all the way up to f(c) and falls all the way after it, so f(c) is the highest value nearby.
A sign table
Take . Its derivative is , which is zero at x = −1 and x = 1. These two points cut the number line into three intervals.
Between neighboring critical points f' is continuous and never zero, so it cannot change sign there: one test value per interval is enough. At x = −2, f' = 12 − 3 = 9, positive. At x = 0, f' = −3, negative. At x = 2, f' = 9, positive.
So the signs run +, then −, then +. At x = −1 the sign changes from + to −: a local maximum, at height −1 + 3 = 2. At x = 1 it changes from − to +: a local minimum, at height 1 − 3 = −2.
The gold curve . It climbs while f' is positive, up to the peak at (−1, 2); falls while f' is negative, down to the trough at (1, −2); then climbs again.
Where both tests are needed, and one is enough
Take . Its derivative is , zero at x = 0 and x = 3.
The second derivative is . At x = 3 it is 108 − 72 = 36, positive, so x = 3 is a minimum. At x = 0 it is 0, and that test is silent.
The sign table settles both. At x = −1, f' = 4 × 1 × (−4) = −16. At x = 1, f' = 4 × 1 × (−2) = −8. At x = 4, f' = 4 × 16 × 1 = 64. The factor is never negative, so the sign of f' is the sign of x − 3, and it runs −, −, +.
At x = 0 the sign is − on both sides: the curve falls, levels off at (0, 0), and keeps falling, so x = 0 is neither a maximum nor a minimum. At x = 3 it changes from − to +: a local minimum, at height 81 − 108 = −27, which agrees with the second derivative.
The gold curve , with the vertical scale squeezed. It is level at (0, 0) and keeps falling; it turns only at (3, −27), where f' changes from − to +.
Where f' does not exist
The first derivative test also works at a critical point where f' does not exist, as long as f is continuous there. has , with no value at 0. For x < 0 the cube root is negative, so f' is negative; for x > 0 it is positive. The sign changes from − to +, so x = 0 is a local minimum, the cusp at the origin.
The second derivative test cannot even start here, because f'(0) is not 0: it does not exist.
The gold curve , where f' runs −, 0, + across the origin, a minimum; and the dashed curve , where f' runs +, 0, +, with no turn. Both have second derivative 0 at the origin.
The usual mistakes
Testing past the next critical point. For , a test value for x = −1 must lie between −1 and 1 on the right; x = 2 is beyond x = 1, where f' is positive again, and would make −1 look like a pause.
Reading the sign of f instead of f'. is positive at x = −0.5 and negative at x = 0.5, but what decides is the gradient, which is negative at both.
Swapping the two cases. + then − is a peak: the curve climbs, then falls.
Calling a pause a turn. has f' positive on both sides of 0, so the curve only levels off there.
A bottling machine
In the application below, the waste of glass depends on a machine setting through . Its second derivative is 0 at the best setting, and the sign of the first derivative on each side settles it.
Worked example: A Bottling Machine's Waste Against Its Setting: a Stationary Point the Second Derivative Cannot Judge
Question A bottling machine wastes W = 5 + (x − 12)41296 kilograms of glass an hour when its filling head is at setting x, for 6 ≤ x ≤ 18. (a) Over which settings is the waste falling, and over which is it rising? (b) Find the setting that wastes least, and show why the second derivative cannot settle it.
1.Differentiate: dWdx = 4(x − 12)31296 = (x − 12)3324 kilograms an hour for each unit of setting.
Differentiating gives dWdx = 4(x − 12)31296 = (x − 12)3324. 2.A cube keeps the sign of what is cubed. For x < 12 the bracket x − 12 is negative, so dWdx is negative; for x > 12 it is positive.
A cube keeps the sign of what is cubed, so the gradient is negative below setting 12 and positive above it. 3.(a) So the waste falls over the settings from 6 to 12 and rises over the settings from 12 to 18.
(a) The waste falls from setting 6 to setting 12, then rises from setting 12 to setting 18. 4.The only stationary point is where dWdx = 0, and a cube is zero only when its bracket is, so x = 12.
The only stationary point is x = 12, where the cube, and so the gradient, is zero. 5.Differentiate again: d2Wdx2 = 3(x − 12)2324 = (x − 12)2108. At x = 12 this is zero, and a second derivative of zero decides nothing: it leaves a maximum, a minimum and a point of inflection all still possible.
The second derivative is (x − 12)2108, which is 0 at x = 12: it decides nothing there. 6.(b) The first-derivative test settles it. The gradient is negative just before x = 12 and positive just after, so the curve turns from falling to rising: setting 12 is a minimum, wasting W = 5 kilograms an hour. Check: settings 6 and 18 each waste 5 + 12961296 = 6 kilograms an hour, which is more.
(b) The gradient turns from negative to positive, so setting 12 is a minimum, wasting 5 kg an hour against 6 at either end.
Answer: (a) the waste falls from setting 6 to setting 12 and rises from setting 12 to setting 18; (b) setting 12, wasting 5 kilograms an hour
Common mistakes
- Calling x = 12 a point of inflection because d2Wdx2 = 0 there. A zero second derivative is needed for a point of inflection but is not enough on its own: the second derivative must also change sign, and (x − 12)2108 is positive on both sides of 12.
- Testing only the ends of the range and reporting setting 6 as the best. Setting 6 wastes 6 kilograms an hour, while the least waste is at the stationary point x = 12, which lies inside the range.