Why a whole-number power stops
The binomial theorem can be written as one formula that does not need Pascal’s triangle: . Each coefficient has one more factor on top than the one before, and one more factor in the factorial underneath.
Put n = 3. The coefficients are 3, then 3 × 2 ÷ 2! = 3, then 3 × 2 × 1 ÷ 3! = 1. The next one is 3 × 2 × 1 × 0 ÷ 4! = 0, because its top now has the factor 3 − 3 = 0. Every coefficient after it has that factor too, so they are all 0, and , row 3 of the triangle.
That is why the expansion stops when n is a positive whole number: the factors n, n − 1, n − 2, … count down and reach 0.
A negative index never stops
Put n = −1 in the same formula. The factors are now −1, −2, −3, −4, …, which count down away from 0 and never reach it. The coefficients are −1, then (−1)(−2) ÷ 2! = 1, then (−1)(−2)(−3) ÷ 3! = −1, then (−1)(−2)(−3)(−4) ÷ 4! = 1, and so on forever.
So , a series with no last term. Multiply the first four terms by 1 + x to see why it works: . When x is small, is tiny, so the four terms give very nearly .
For n = −2 the coefficients are −2, then (−2)(−3) ÷ 2 = 3, then (−2)(−3)(−4) ÷ 6 = −4, so . The sign of the x term follows n, and the term is positive because two negative factors multiply.
Close to the function near zero
At x = 0.1, the first four terms give 1 − 0.1 + 0.01 − 0.001 = 0.909, and to 6 decimal places. At x = 0.5 they give 1 − 0.5 + 0.25 − 0.125 = 0.625, and , further off but still near.
Past x = 1 the series moves away. At x = 1.5 the four terms give 1 − 1.5 + 2.25 − 3.375 = −1.625, while . At x = 2 they give 1 − 2 + 4 − 8 = −5, while .
The gold curve is , which has no value at x = −1. The plain curve is the first four terms, . Near x = 0 the two are almost on top of each other. At x = 1.5 the dots show them far apart: 0.4 on the gold curve and −1.625 on the plain one.
Why it needs |x| < 1
Adding more terms decides whether the series has a sum. At x = 0.5 the running totals are 1, 0.5, 0.75, 0.625, 0.6875, 0.65625, …, swinging above and below by less each time, and closing in on .
At x = 2 the running totals are 1, −1, 3, −5, 11, −21, …. Each term is −2 times the one before, so the terms grow and the totals swing further each time. They never settle, so the series has no sum, and it cannot equal .
The terms of the n = −1 series are the powers of −x. They shrink when |x| < 1 and grow when |x| > 1, so the series is valid only for |x| < 1, which is −1 < x < 1.
The running totals of at x = 0.5, after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 terms: 1, 0.5, 0.75, 0.625, 0.6875 and 0.65625. The plain straight line is at . The dots fall above and below it in turn, each one closer than the last.
A fractional index
The same formula works for a fraction. With n = ½, the coefficients are ½, then ½ × (−½) ÷ 2! = −⅛, then . So . The factors ½, −½, , … never reach 0, so this series never stops either.
Every index that is not a positive whole number gives a series that runs forever, and every one of them is valid only for |x| < 1.
Check at x = 0.1. The four terms give 1 + 0.05 − 0.00125 + 0.0000625 = 1.0488125, and to 7 decimal places, so the two agree to 5 decimal places.
The first three terms of a negative power
Expand as far as . Here n = −3, so nx = −3x, and . So .
Check at x = 0.1: 1 − 0.3 + 0.06 = 0.76, and . The next term is (−3)(−4)(−5) ÷ 3! = −10 times , which is −0.01 here, and 0.76 − 0.01 = 0.75 is closer still.
The usual mistakes
Getting the sign of the x term wrong. For the term is nx = −3x, not +3x: the sign follows n.
Squaring n for the coefficient. It is , so for n = −3 it is (−3)(−4) ÷ 2 = 6, not 9.
Forgetting the factorial. The coefficient for n = ½ is ½ × (−½) ÷ 2 = −⅛, not −¼.
Using the series outside |x| < 1. The algebra can be written for any x, but past |x| = 1 the terms grow and the series has no sum. The range does not depend on n: it is |x| < 1 forevery index.
A pendulum on a hot day
In the application below, a pendulum grows 4% longer, and each swing takes times as long. That is with x = 0.04, well inside |x| < 1. The same series cannot find as , because x = 2 is outside the range.
Worked example: A Clock Pendulum That Grows 4% Longer on a Hot Day: A Square Root from the Binomial Series
Question The time a pendulum takes for one swing is proportional to the square root of its length. On a hot day the pendulum of a clock grows 4% longer, so each swing takes √1.04 times as long as before. (a) Expand (1 + x)12 in ascending powers of x as far as the term in x2, and state the values of x for which the expansion is valid. Use it to estimate √1.04 to 4 decimal places. (b) Each swing took 2 seconds before. Estimate the time for one swing now. Explain why the same expansion cannot be used to find √3 by writing it as (1 + 2)12.
1.The binomial series for any index n is (1 + x)n = 1 + nx + n(n − 1)2!x2 + ⋯. With n = 12, the coefficient of x is 12 and the coefficient of x2 is 12 × (−12)2 = −18.
The binomial series for any index is (1 + x)n = 1 + nx + n(n − 1)2!x2 + ⋯. With n = 12 the coefficient of x2 is −18. 2.So (1 + x)12 = 1 + 12x − 18x2 + ⋯. The index is not a whole number, so the series never stops, and it is valid only for −1 < x < 1.
So (1 + x)12 = 1 + 12x − 18x2 + ⋯. The shaded band is −1 < x < 1, where the series is valid. 3.(a) The length grows by 4%, so x = 0.04: √1.04 ≈ 1 + 0.02 − 0.00168 = 1 + 0.02 − 0.0002 = 1.0198. A calculator gives 1.019804, so the estimate is right to 4 decimal places.
(a) At x = 0.04 the three terms give √1.04 ≈ 1.0198. There the two curves lie on top of each other. 4.(b) One swing now takes about 2 × 1.0198 = 2.0396 seconds, about 0.04 seconds longer than before, so the clock runs slow.
(b) One swing now takes about 2 × 1.0198 = 2.0396 seconds, so the clock runs slow. 5.For √3 = (1 + 2)12 the value x = 2 lies outside −1 < x < 1. The terms of the series are then 1, 1, −0.5, 0.5, −0.625, 0.875, …, which grow instead of shrinking, so their sum never settles and the series cannot be used.
At x = 2, outside the band, the curves are far apart: √3 ≈ 1.73 against 1.5. The terms grow, and the series cannot give √3.
Answer: (a) (1 + x)12 = 1 + 12x − 18x2 + ⋯, valid for −1 < x < 1, so √1.04 ≈ 1.0198; (b) about 2.0396 seconds; x = 2 lies outside −1 < x < 1, where the terms grow and the series does not converge
Common mistakes
- Writing the coefficient of x2 as 12 × (−12) = −14 and forgetting to divide by 2! = 2. The coefficient is −18, and with −14 the estimate would be 1.0196, wrong in the fourth decimal place.
- Using the series for any value of x because the algebra works for any x. The series only converges for −1 < x < 1; outside that range its terms grow and its sum means nothing.
More polynomials and the binomial theorem problems, worked step by step →