An integral that is an angle
is not a power of x, and its numerator is not the derivative of its denominator, which would be 2x. Yet it is a derivative: the derivative of .
Here is why. If , then x = tan y, and . So . Read backwards, .
An area of
The area under from x = 0 to x = 1 is . An area under a curve comes out as an angle: the angle whose tangent is 1.
From 0 to 10 the area is . As the right-hand edge moves further out, the area keeps growing, but stays below , so the area never passes .
The curve , from height 1 at x = 0 to height ½ at x = 1, shaded between them. The shaded area is .
in the same way
If , then x = sin y, and . With y between and , cos y is not negative, so . So , and , for x between −1 and 1.
The area under from 0 to ½ is .
The curve , which has height 1 at x = 0 and climbs without limit toward x = −1 and x = 1. The region from 0 to ½ is shaded, and its area is .
With in place of 1
For , with a > 0, substitute x = au, so dx = a du. The denominator becomes , and the integral becomes . Putting back: .
For , a = 3, since 9 = 3 × 3. So the integral is . Check: differentiating gives . From 0 to 3 the integral is .
For the root, the a cancels: , and dx = a du divided by that leaves . So , with no in front. From 0 to 1, .
A number in front of is handled the same way. , so , the ½ undoing the 2 the chain rule brings out. From 0 to ½ that is .
The sign decides
factors as (x − 1)(x + 1), so splits into partial fractions and integrates to logs: ½ ln|x − 1| − ½ ln|x + 1| + C. is never 0, so it has no factors, and integrates to instead.
The numerator matters too. is half of , whose numerator is the derivative of its denominator, so it integrates to a log: . Only a constant over gives .
Worked example: A Weld Inspection Source Beside a Walkway: A Dose That Comes Out as an Inverse Tangent
Question A small gamma source used for weld inspection stands 3 meters from a straight walkway. At a distance d meters from the source the dose rate is 30d2 microsieverts per second, and a technician walks the walkway at one meter per second, so each meter walked is a second spent. Writing x for the meters past the point of closest approach, d2 = 9 + x2. (a) What dose does the technician pick up between x = 0 and x = 3? (b) The walkway is moved so that it passes 4 meters from the source instead. What dose is picked up between x = 0 and x = 4 then? Take π = 3.14159 and give each answer to three significant figures.
1.The dose is ∫03309 + x2dx. Substitute x = 3tanθ, since 9 + 9tan2θ = 9sec2θ turns the sum of two squares into a single square.
The dose is ∫03309 + x2dx. Substitute x = 3tanθ, since 9 + 9tan2θ = 9sec2θ. 2.The differential is dx = 3sec2θ dθ, so the integrand becomes 309sec2θ × 3sec2θ dθ = 10 dθ. Both squared secants cancel and nothing is left but a constant.
The differential gives dx = 3sec2θ dθ, so the integrand becomes 309sec2θ × 3sec2θ dθ = 10 dθ. 3.The limits travel with the substitution. At x = 0, tanθ = 0, so θ = 0; at x = 3, tanθ = 1, so θ = π4.
The limits travel with it: x = 0 gives θ = 0, and x = 3 gives tanθ = 1, so θ = π4. 4.(a) The dose is 10[θ]0π4 = 10π4 = 5π2 = 7.85 microsieverts. That working, done once and for all, is the standard result ∫dxa2 + x2 = 1atan−1xa + C.
(a) The dose is 10 × π4 = 5π2 = 7.85 microsieverts, which is the standard 1atan−1xa written out. 5.(b) With the offset 4, ∫043016 + x2dx = 304[tan−1x4]04 = 304 × π4 = 15π8 = 5.89 microsieverts. Check: each answer is 30a × π4, so moving the walkway from 3 meters out to 4 multiplies the dose by 34, and three quarters of 7.85 is 5.89.
(b) At an offset of 4 meters the dose is 304 × π4 = 15π8 = 5.89 microsieverts, three quarters of the first.
Answer: (a) 5π2 = 7.85 microsieverts; (b) 15π8 = 5.89 microsieverts, three quarters of the first
Common mistakes
- Expecting a logarithm, and writing the answer as a multiple of ln(9 + x2). A logarithm appears when the top of the fraction is the derivative of the bottom; the derivative of 9 + x2 is 2x, and the top here is a constant. A constant over a sum of two squares gives an inverse tangent.
- Leaving the limits as 0 and 3 after substituting x = 3tanθ. Those are meters, and after the substitution the variable is an angle, so the limits become 0 and π4 radians. Using 0 and 3 would give 30 microsieverts, nearly four times the true dose.
More techniques of integration problems, worked step by step →
The usual mistakes
Expecting a log. differentiates to , which has an x on top that does not.
Mixing up the pair. goes with and no root; goes with the root of .
Leaving out the . differentiates to , three times too much.
Using for a. In , a = 2, so the answer is , not .
A factor in front of . The a in the root cancels the a in dx, so nothing is left over.