A fixed ratio
In a geometric series every term is the one before multiplied by the same number r, the common ratio. In , each term is half of the one before. A geometric series converges when |r| < 1 and diverges when , and when it converges its sum is , which here is .
Most series have no fixed ratio. Divide each term of by the one before and the answers are 2, then 1, then , then : the ratio changes from term to term. The ratio test asks where that ratio settles as the terms go on, and treats the rest of the series as a geometric series with that ratio.
r = 0.8: |r| < 1, so rᴺ → 0 and the sums approach 1/(1 − r) = 5 without crossing it; the gap is 2.048
Set r = 0.5 and take at least 10 terms
Each bar is a running total of the geometric series . At r = 0.8 the first four totals are 1, 1.8, 2.44 and 2.952, and the dashed line is the sum, . Drag N to add terms: the totals climb toward 5 and never cross it. Drag r past 1 and they run off the top.
The test
Write the series as , and divide each term by the one before it: . Take its size, , so that negative terms make no difference, and let L be the number it approaches as n grows.
If L < 1, the series converges. If L > 1, it diverges. If L = 1, the test decides nothing, and another test is needed.
Here is why L < 1 is enough. Choose a number r between L and 1. Once n is large enough, every ratio is below r, so from that term on each term is less than r times the one before in size. The sizes of the remaining terms are then smaller than the terms of a geometric series with ratio r, and that series converges because r < 1. So the sizes add up to a finite total. The series converges absolutely: it would converge even with every term made positive.
If L > 1, then once n is large enough every term is larger in size than the one before. The terms grow instead of shrinking toward 0, and a series whose terms do not tend to 0 diverges.
Factorials underneath
Take , starting from n = 0: . To divide one term by the one before, use two facts: , and (n + 1)! = (n + 1) × n!. So the next term is this term multiplied by 2 and divided by n + 1, and the ratio is .
As n grows, tends to 0, so L = 0. That is less than 1, so the series converges. Each new term gains a factor of 2 on top and a factor of n + 1 underneath, and from n = 2 on the factor underneath is the larger one.
The running totals agree. Term by term they are 1, 3, 5, 6.333333, 7, 7.266667, 7.355556, 7.380952 and 7.387302, closing in on . This is the series for with x = 2.
The terms for n = 0 to 8. They rise from n = 0 to n = 1, where the ratio is 2, stay level from n = 1 to n = 2, where it is 1, and then fall faster and faster as the ratio drops further below 1.
The same terms turned over
Turn every term over and the nth term becomes : . Now the factorial is on top, so the next term is this one multiplied by n + 1 and divided by 2, and the ratio is .
As n grows, grows without limit, so L is larger than 1 and the series diverges. From n = 2 on, the ratio is above 1 and every term is bigger than the one before; by n = 8 the term is 157.5. The terms do not tend to 0, which is the nth term test reaching the same verdict.
When L = 1
For the harmonic series , each term divided by the one before is . At n = 10 that is 0.909091, at n = 100 it is 0.990099, and at n = 1000 it is 0.999001, so L = 1. For the ratio is , which is 0.826446 at n = 10, 0.980296 at n = 100 and 0.998003 at n = 1000, so L = 1 here too.
Yet the two series do opposite things. diverges: its running total is 2.929 after 10 terms, 5.187 after 100 and 7.485 after 1000, and it keeps growing. converges, by the p-series test with p = 2: its running totals at the same points are 1.549768, 1.634984 and 1.643935, closing in on .
So L = 1 cannot tell convergence from divergence, and another test has to decide: the p-series test, a comparison, or the alternating series test. The ratio test works best when the terms contain factorials or powers such as . When the terms are built from powers of n alone, it gives L = 1.
The gold curve is the ratio for , and the plain one is for , plotted against n. Both climb toward the dashed line at 1 without reaching it, and one series diverges while the other converges.
The usual mistakes
Dividing the wrong way round. The test divides each term by the one before it. Dividing a term by the one after it gives the reciprocal ratio, so a limit of 0 becomes one that grows without limit, and the verdict flips.
Canceling the factorials wrongly. (n + 1)! divided by n! is n + 1, not n, because (n + 1)! = (n + 1) × n!.
Reading L = 1 as a verdict. and both give L = 1; the first diverges and the second converges.
Judging by the first few ratios. The first ratio of is 2, which is above 1, and still the series converges. The test uses the limit of the ratio, not its early values.
Calls at a helpdesk
In the application below, the chance of n calls in one minute has n! underneath, the same shape as with 3 in place of 2. The ratio test shows that the chances add up to a finite total, and the ratio also shows where the chances are largest.
Worked example: A Helpdesk's Busiest Minute: A Factorial on the Bottom and the Chance of Being Swamped
Question A helpdesk receives an average of 3 calls a minute. The chance of exactly n calls arriving in one minute is pn = 3nn!e−3. (a) Use the ratio test on ∑n=0∞ 3nn! to show that these chances add to a finite number, and say what that number must be. (b) The desk can answer at most 5 calls in a minute. What is the chance that it is swamped in a given minute?
1.Write the ratio of one term to the one before it: an+1an = 3n+1(n+1)! × n!3n = 3n+1, because (n+1)! = (n+1) × n! and every other factor cancels.
Each term over the one before is 3n+1(n+1)! × n!3n = 3n+1. 2.Let n grow. Then 3n+1 → 0, and 0 < 1, so by the ratio test ∑ 3nn! converges. The same ratio says where the terms turn: it is above 1 at n = 0 and n = 1, equal to 1 at n = 2, and below 1 from n = 3 on, so the terms rise to a peak and then fall away quickly.
3n+1 → 0, which is below 1, so the ratio test gives convergence. 3.(a) The chances add to a finite number. In fact ∑n=0∞ 3nn! = e3, so ∑ pn = e−3 × e3 = 1, which is what a complete list of chances has to add to.
(a) The chances add to e−3 × e3 = 1. 4.For part (b), being swamped means 6 or more calls, and it is shorter to find the chance of 5 or fewer and subtract. ∑n=05 3nn! = 1 + 3 + 4.5 + 4.5 + 3.375 + 2.025 = 18.4, so the chance of 5 or fewer calls is 18.4e−3 = 0.916.
Five or fewer calls: 18.4e−3 = 0.916. 5.(b) The chance of being swamped is 1 − 0.916 = 0.084, about one minute in twelve.
(b) Six or more calls: 1 − 0.916 = 0.084, about one minute in twelve.
Answer: (a) The ratio is 3n+1, whose limit is 0, so the series converges and the chances add to 1; (b) about 0.084, roughly one minute in twelve
Common mistakes
- Canceling the factorials wrongly and writing (n+1)!n! = n. It is n + 1, since (n+1)! = (n+1) × n!. The slip turns the ratio into 3n, which still tends to 0 here, but in a series where the verdict hangs on the limit it changes the answer.
- Answering with the chance of 5 or fewer calls. The desk is swamped when 6 or more arrive, so what is wanted is the complement, 1 − 0.916, and not the 0.916 itself.