The question integration asks
Differentiating starts from a function and asks for its gradient. Integrating starts from the gradient and asks for the function. If F'(x) = f(x), then F is called an antiderivative of f.
Every derivative already learned can be read backwards this way. is the derivative of , so is an antiderivative of . sinh x differentiates to cosh x, so sinh x is an antiderivative of cosh x, and cosh x is an antiderivative of sinh x. is an antiderivative of itself, and sin x is an antiderivative of cos x.
Each of these claims is checked the same way: differentiate the proposed answer and see whether the original function comes back.
Last move first
The power rule makes two moves on . First the power 3 comes down as a multiplier, then the power drops by one, giving . To undo a pair of moves, undo the second one first. So start from and put one back on the power, giving . Then undo the multiply by dividing by the new power, 3: .
The order matters. Dividing by the old power first gives , and then raising the power gives . That differentiates to , not . The divisor has to be the power the term ends up with, because that is the number differentiating brings down.
The gold curve is and the plain curve is . At x = 1 the tangent to F, y = 3x − 2, has gradient 3, and f(1) = 3. At x = −1 the tangent to F, y = 3x + 2, also has gradient 3, and f(−1) = 3. The height of f at each x is the gradient of F there.
One answer gives all of them
If F'(x) = f(x), then F(x) + 5, F(x) − 2 and F(x) + C for any constant C are antiderivatives as well, because a constant differentiates to 0. On a graph, adding C slides the curve straight up or down, and sliding a curve does not change how steep it is at any x.
Nothing else works. Suppose F and G are both antiderivatives of f. Then G'(x) − F'(x) = f(x) − f(x) = 0, so the function G − F has gradient 0 everywhere. Along an interval, a function with gradient 0 never rises or falls, so it is a constant. Any two antiderivatives of the same function differ by a constant, and the complete answer is F(x) + C.
Two answers that look different
Take f(x) = 2x + 2. One person integrates term by term and gets . Another notices that differentiates, by the chain rule, to 2(x + 1) = 2x + 2, and gets . Both differentiate to 2x + 2, so both are right.
They are not the same function: , which is 1 more than at every x. That 1 is the constant between two members of one family. Written with + C, the two answers describe the same set of curves.
The gold curve is and the plain curve is , exactly 1 below it everywhere. At x = 0.5 their tangents, y = 3x + 0.75 through (0.5, 2.25) and y = 3x − 0.25 through (0.5, 1.25), are parallel, with gradient 3.
the tangent at x = 1 has gradient 2x = 2 for every C: shifting F up or down changes F, never F′, so ∫ 2x dx is the whole family x² + C
Slide the curve up and down and watch the tangent's gradient
The family , with C = −1 picked out and its tangent at x = 1, gradient 2. The dashed tangent is the one on at the same x, parallel to it. Drag C and the curve slides; drag x and the gradient follows 2x, whatever C is.
Check by differentiating
Suppose the claim is that integrates to . Differentiate: , the original. The claim stands. The same check confirms as the integral of cosh x + 2x.
The check also catches mistakes. A tempting way to integrate x(x + 1) is to integrate each factor, and , and multiply them, giving . That differentiates to , which is 2.5 at x = 1, while x(x + 1) is 2 there. Multiply out first instead: , which integrates to , and that differentiates back to .
The usual mistakes
Differentiating instead. The integral of is not ; integrating raises the power.
Raising the power without dividing. is not the integral of , because it differentiates to , four times too much. The integral of is .
Dividing by the old power. differentiates to , not .
Leaving out the + C. Without it the answer is one curve of the family, and a later question that names a point on the curve has no constant left to find.