Solving Exponential Equations

Take logs and the power comes down.

The unknown is an exponent

An exponential equation has the unknown in an exponent, as in 2ˣ = 32. The usual moves do not reach it. Dividing both sides by 2 gives 2ˣ / 2 = 16, which is 2ˣ⁻¹ = 16, and x is still in the exponent. Adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing all act on the value of 2ˣ, not on the x inside it.

There are two ways to reach it. If both sides can be written as powers of the same base, compare the exponents. If they cannot, take logarithms, since a logarithm undoes raising to a power.

Same base: equate the powers

In 2ˣ = 32, the right side is a power of 2: 32 = 2⁵. So the equation says 2ˣ = 2⁵. The graph of y = 2ˣ rises all the way from left to right, so it reaches each height only once: two powers of 2 are equal only when their exponents are equal. So x = 5.

Often a number has to be rewritten first. To solve 2ˣ⁺¹ = 8, write 8 as 2³: then 2ˣ⁺¹ = 2³, so x + 1 = 3 and x = 2. Check: 2³ = 8.

Sometimes both sides need rewriting. In 9ˣ = 27, 27 is not a whole power of 9, but both are powers of 3: 9 = 3² and 27 = 3³. The power of a power multiplies the exponents, so 9ˣ = (3²)ˣ = 3²ˣ, and the equation becomes 3²ˣ = 3³. So 2x = 3 and x = 3/2. Check: 9^(3/2) is the square root of 9, cubed, which is 3³ = 27.

The same works with the unknown on both sides. In 4ˣ = 8ˣ⁻¹, write 4 = 2² and 8 = 2³: 2²ˣ = 2^(3(x − 1)), so 2x = 3x − 3 and x = 3. Check: 4³ = 64 and 8² = 64.

xy

The gold curve is y = 2ˣ and the white line is the level 32. The curve rises all the way, so it meets the line only once, at (5, 32): 2ˣ = 32 has the one solution x = 5.

Different bases: take logs of both sides

Most equations cannot be written with one base. 40 is not a power of 2, and 20 is not a power of 3. For these, take the logarithm of both sides.

This is allowed for the same reason as adding 5 to both sides. The two sides of 2ˣ = 32 are the same number, so their logarithms are the same number too. The only condition is that the number is positive, since only positive numbers have logarithms, and a power of a positive base is always positive.

Take the common logarithm, to base 10, of both sides: log(2ˣ) = log 32. The power law of logarithms, log(aⁿ) = n log a, brings the exponent down to the front: x log 2 = log 32. Now x is an ordinary unknown multiplied by a number, log 2.

Then it is an ordinary division

Divide both sides by log 2: x = log 32 / log 2. A calculator gives log 32 = 1.50515 and log 2 = 0.30103, to 5 decimal places, and 1.50515 ÷ 0.30103 = 5. The answer is exactly 5, because log 32 = log(2⁵) = 5 log 2. Check: 2⁵ = 32.

Here the logs only confirmed what the same-base method found, and log 32 / log 2 is log₂ 32 by the change of base rule. The method matters when no whole power works.

When no whole power works

Solve 2ˣ = 40. Since 2⁵ = 32 and 2⁶ = 64, x lies between 5 and 6, and no whole number of 2s multiplied together makes 40. The same two steps still work. Take logs of both sides: x log 2 = log 40. Divide by log 2: x = log 40 / log 2 = 1.60206 / 0.30103 = 5.32, to 2 decimal places.

Check by putting it back: 2^5.32 = 39.95, to 2 decimal places, which is 40 to the accuracy of the rounded answer. With more decimal places, 2^5.3219 = 40.00.

Any base of logarithm works, as long as both sides use the same one. With natural logarithms, x = ln 40 / ln 2 = 3.6889 / 0.6931 = 5.32 again.

xy

The gold curve is y = 2ˣ and the white line is the level 40. The curve passes (5, 32) below the line and (6, 64) above it, and meets the line between them, at x = 5.32.

The unknown on both sides

Solve 3ˣ = 2ˣ⁺¹. The bases are different, so take logs of both sides: x log 3 = (x + 1) log 2. The whole exponent x + 1 comes down, so log 2 multiplies both of its terms: x log 3 = x log 2 + log 2.

Collect the x terms on one side: x log 3 − x log 2 = log 2, so x(log 3 − log 2) = log 2. Then x = log 2 / (log 3 − log 2) = 0.30103 / 0.17609 = 1.71, to 2 decimal places.

Check: 3^1.71 and 2^2.71 are both 6.54, to 2 decimal places.

A number in front of the power

Solve 5 × 3ˣ = 200. The 5 multiplies the power; it is not part of the base. Divide both sides by 5 first: 3ˣ = 40. Then take logs: x = log 40 / log 3 = 1.60206 / 0.47712 = 3.36, to 2 decimal places.

Taking logs straight away also works, using the product law: log 5 + x log 3 = log 200, so x = (log 200 − log 5) / log 3, and log 200 − log 5 = log 40. What does not work is treating 5 × 3ˣ as 15ˣ: the power applies to the 3 alone.

Inequalities: watch the sign of the log

Questions that ask "when does it first drop below" lead to an inequality. Find the smallest whole number x with 0.8ˣ < 0.1.

Take logs of both sides. The logarithm keeps the order of positive numbers, because a bigger number needs a bigger power of 10, so the inequality stays the same way round: x log 0.8 < log 0.1.

Now divide by log 0.8. The number 0.8 is less than 1, so its logarithm is negative: log 0.8 = −0.09691, to 5 decimal places. Dividing both sides of an inequality by a negative number reverses it: x > log 0.1 / log 0.8 = (−1) / (−0.09691) = 10.32, to 2 decimal places.

So the smallest whole number is x = 11. Check the whole numbers on either side: 0.8¹⁰ = 0.107, which is not below 0.1, and 0.8¹¹ = 0.086, which is.

A quadratic in disguise

Some equations have two powers of the same base, as in 4ˣ − 5 × 2ˣ + 4 = 0. The key is that 4ˣ = (2²)ˣ = (2ˣ)². So if u stands for 2ˣ, the equation is u² − 5u + 4 = 0, an ordinary quadratic.

It factors as (u − 1)(u − 4) = 0, so u = 1 or u = 4. Then 2ˣ = 1 gives x = 0, and 2ˣ = 4 gives x = 2. Check: 4⁰ − 5 × 2⁰ + 4 = 1 − 5 + 4 = 0, and 4² − 5 × 2² + 4 = 16 − 20 + 4 = 0.

A root of the quadratic can be impossible. 4ˣ − 2ˣ − 6 = 0 becomes u² − u − 6 = 0, which factors as (u − 3)(u + 2) = 0, so u = 3 or u = −2. But u is 2ˣ, and every power of 2 is positive, so 2ˣ = −2 has no solution and u = −2 is thrown away. That leaves 2ˣ = 3, so x = log 3 / log 2 = 1.58, to 2 decimal places. Check: 2ˣ = 3 makes 4ˣ = 3² = 9, and 9 − 3 − 6 = 0.

The usual mistakes

Dividing the numbers instead of their logs. 2ˣ = 40 does not give x = 40 / 2 = 20. That treats 2ˣ as 2 × x, and 2²⁰ is over a million.

Giving the number instead of the power. 3ˣ = 27 asks which power of 3 makes 27, so x = 3, not 27.

Subtracting the logs. x = log 40 / log 2, which is 5.32. log 40 − log 2 is log(40 / 2) = log 20 = 1.30, a different number.

Bringing down only part of the exponent. The log of 2ˣ⁺¹ is (x + 1) log 2, not x + log 2: log 2 multiplies both terms of the exponent.

Keeping the inequality the same way round after dividing by the log of a number below 1. That log is negative, so the sign reverses.

Worked example: A Rubber Ball's Rebound Heights, and the First Rebound Lower Than 5 cm

Question A rubber ball is dropped from a height of 400 cm onto a hard floor. Each time it bounces, it rises to 60% of the height it fell from. (a) Find the height of the 5th rebound, correct to 3 significant figures. (b) Which rebound is the first to be lower than 5 cm?

  1. 1.The first rebound is 60% of 400 cm, which is 0.6 × 400 = 240 cm. Each rebound after that is 0.6 times the one before, so the heights form a geometric sequence with first term a = 240 and common ratio r = 0.6.

    2401144286.43456789rebounda = 240, r = 0.6
    2401144286.43456789rebounda = 240, r = 0.6
    The first rebound is 0.6 × 400 = 240 cm, and each one after is 0.6 times the one before.
  2. 2.The height of the nth rebound is hn = arn−1 = 240 × 0.6n−1 cm.

    2401144286.43456789rebounda = 240, r = 0.6h = 240 × 0.6n − 1
    2401144286.43456789rebounda = 240, r = 0.6h = 240 × 0.6n − 1
    The nth rebound is hn = 240 × 0.6n−1 cm.
  3. 3.(a) h5 = 240 × 0.64 = 240 × 0.1296 = 31.104. The 5th rebound is 31.1 cm high, correct to 3 significant figures.

    2401144286.43431.156789rebounda = 240, r = 0.6h = 240 × 0.6n − 15th: 240 × 0.64= 31.104
    2401144286.43431.156789rebounda = 240, r = 0.6h = 240 × 0.6n − 15th: 240 × 0.64= 31.104
    (a) The 5th rebound is 31.104 cm, which is 31.1 cm to 3 significant figures.
  4. 4.For (b), solve 240 × 0.6n−1 < 5. Divide both sides by 240: 0.6n−1 < 5240. Take logarithms: (n − 1)log 0.6 < log 5240. Because log 0.6 is negative, dividing both sides by it reverses the inequality: n − 1 > log(5/240)log 0.6 ≈ 7.58.

    2401144286.43431.1567895 cmrebounda = 240, r = 0.6h = 240 × 0.6n − 15th: 240 × 0.64= 31.1040.6n − 1< 5/240, so n − 1 > 7.58
    2401144286.43431.1567895 cmrebounda = 240, r = 0.6h = 240 × 0.6n − 15th: 240 × 0.64= 31.1040.6n − 1< 5/240, so n − 1 > 7.58
    Dividing by log 0.6, which is negative, reverses the inequality: n − 1 > 7.58.
  5. 5.So n > 8.58, and the first whole number above it is n = 9. (b) The 9th rebound is the first lower than 5 cm. Check: h8 = 240 × 0.67 ≈ 6.72 cm and h9 = 240 × 0.68 ≈ 4.03 cm.

    2401144286.43431.15676.7284.0395 cmrebounda = 240, r = 0.6h = 240 × 0.6n − 15th: 240 × 0.64= 31.1040.6n − 1< 5/240, so n − 1 > 7.588th: 6.72 cm, 9th: 4.03 cm
    2401144286.43431.15676.7284.0395 cmrebounda = 240, r = 0.6h = 240 × 0.6n − 15th: 240 × 0.64= 31.1040.6n − 1< 5/240, so n − 1 > 7.588th: 6.72 cm, 9th: 4.03 cm
    (b) The 8th rebound is still above 5 cm; the 9th, at 4.03 cm, is the first below.

Answer: (a) 31.1 cm; (b) the 9th rebound

Common mistakes

  • Using 400 cm as the first term, which gives 400 × 0.64 ≈ 51.8 cm for the 5th rebound. The 400 cm is the drop, not a rebound. The first rebound is 240 cm.
  • Keeping the inequality sign the same way round after dividing by log 0.6. That logarithm is negative, and dividing both sides of an inequality by a negative number reverses it.

More sequences and series problems, worked step by step →

Practice Solving Exponential Equations in the app