No end to substitute
The region under from x = 1 runs on to the right without end. The curve gets closer and closer to the x-axis and never meets it, so the region has no right-hand edge.
An ordinary definite integral is worked by putting the two limits into an antiderivative. Here there is no upper limit to put in: infinity is not a number, and it cannot be substituted for x.
The gold curve , shaded from x = 1 to x = 6. The shaded part has area . The region it belongs to carries on past the edge of the frame, beyond any value of x.
Stop at t, then let t grow
Stop the region at a finite x = t, where the integral is an ordinary one: .
Now let t grow. At t = 2 the area is 0.5; at t = 10 it is 0.9; at t = 100 it is 0.99; at t = 1000 it is 0.999. As t grows without bound, shrinks to 0, so the area tends to 1.
That limit is what the integral of from 1 to infinity means. It is written , and the integral is said to converge. When the limit does not exist, the integral diverges and has no value.
1 − 1/b < 1 for every b and 1/b → 0, so the area tends to 1: the integral converges although the region never ends
Push b past 100 and see whether the area passes 1
The region under from 1 to b = 10, with its area as the gold bar: , below the dashed ceiling at 1. Drag b along its scale to 100 and then 1000: the area becomes 0.99 and then 0.999, and the bar never reaches the ceiling. Switch to : at b = 10 the area is , and the bar is already through the ceiling.
Endless, but finite
So a region of endless width can have a finite area. The strips far out are thin enough that, all added together, they never push the total past 1. The region from 1 to 2 has area , and the whole of the endless rest, beyond x = 2, has area as well.
The same happens under from x = 0. The area to t is , and shrinks to 0 as t grows, so the integral converges to 1. At t = 10 the area is already 0.99995.
does not settle
Under the area from 1 to t is . At t = 10 it is 2.303; at t = 1000 it is 6.908; at t = 1000000 it is 13.82. A logarithm grows without bound, slowly, so this area passes every number in the end. The integral of from 1 to infinity diverges.
Both and shrink to 0, so shrinking to 0 does not decide it; how fast they shrink does. At x = 100, is 0.01 while is 0.0001.
The gold curve , shaded from x = 1 to x = 8, and the dashed curve below it. To x = 8 the area under is , and under it is . Carried on without end, the first grows without bound and the second tends to 1.
Any power of x
For a power p other than 1, the area under from 1 to t is . When p > 1 the power 1 − p is negative, so shrinks to 0 and the area tends to . When p < 1 the power is positive, grows without bound, and the integral diverges. At p = 1 the area is ln t, which also diverges.
So the integral of from 1 to infinity converges exactly when p > 1. For p = 1.5 the area to t = 100 is 1.8, to t = 10000 it is 1.98, and the limit is . For p = 0.5 the area is , which is 18 at t = 100 and 198 at t = 10000.
Infinitely tall
The other kind of improper integral has a finite width but an integrand that blows up at one end. The integral of from 0 to 4 is one: the width is only 4, but grows without bound as x approaches 0, and at x = 0 it has no value at all.
The cure is the same, taken at the bad end. Start at a small t > 0 and integrate from there: the antiderivative of is , so the area from t to 4 is . Then let t approach 0 from above. At t = 0.25 the area is 3; at t = 0.01 it is 3.8; at t = 0.0001 it is 3.98. The limit is 4, so the integral converges to 4.
Under the same move fails. The area from t to 1 is ln 1 − ln t = −ln t, which is 4.605 at t = 0.01 and 9.210 at t = 0.0001, and it grows without bound as t approaches 0. Near 0 the test on powers turns round: the integral of from 0 to 1 converges exactly when p < 1.
The gold curve , which runs off the top of the frame as x approaches 0. The shaded region runs from t = 0.25 to 4 and has area . As t moves left toward 0, the shaded area tends to 4.
Both ends, or a break inside
A region can be endless in both directions. Under the area from 0 to t is arctan t, which tends to as t grows. The curve is symmetric about the y-axis, so the area from −t to 0 tends to as well. Split at 0, take each limit on its own, and the whole region has area .
An integrand can also blow up inside the interval. The integral of from −1 to 1 looks ordinary, and putting the limits into gives −1 − 1 = −2. That cannot be right: is positive everywhere, so no area under it is negative. The function blows up at x = 0, so split there. The area from t to 1 is , which is 99 at t = 0.01 and grows without bound, so the integral diverges.
The usual mistakes
Substituting infinity as if it were a number. The integral is a limit of ordinary integrals, and only the limit says whether it has a value at all.
Deciding that an integrand which shrinks to 0 must have a finite integral. shrinks to 0, and its area from 1 grows without bound.
Missing the infinitely tall kind. The integral of from 0 to 4 has finite limits, but blows up at 0, so that end needs a limit too.
Putting limits straight into an antiderivative across a point where the integrand blows up. The integral of from −1 to 1 is not −2; it diverges.
Two thrusters left running
In the application below, two thrusts both fall away to nothing. One falls exponentially and its total impulse converges; the other falls like a reciprocal and its total passes any figure.
Worked example: Two Ion Thrusters Left Running Forever: The Total Impulse of Each
Question A probe's ion thruster gives a thrust of F = 240e−0.002n millinewtons, where n is the number of seconds since it was lit, and the mission plans to leave it burning without end. The total impulse is the integral of the thrust over all time. (a) Find the total impulse, and the time by which nine tenths of it has been delivered. (b) A second design would give a thrust of F = 2401 + 0.002n millinewtons, which also falls away to nothing. Find its total impulse to a million seconds and to a hundred million seconds, and say whether it has a total impulse at all.
1.Integrate the first thrust to a finite time T: ∫0T240e−0.002ndn = [−120000e−0.002n]0T = 120000(1 − e−0.002T) millinewton-seconds.
Integrate to a finite time first: ∫0T240e−0.002ndn = 120000(1 − e−0.002T). 2.(a) As T grows, e−0.002T → 0, so the total settles at 120000 millinewton-seconds, that is 120 newton-seconds. At T of a million seconds and again at T of a hundred million the figure reads 120000 to every place a calculator shows: the tail beyond a million seconds is smaller than any of them.
(a) As T grows, e−0.002T → 0, so the total settles at 120000 millinewton-seconds, that is 120 newton-seconds. 3.Nine tenths of that total has arrived when 1 − e−0.002n = 0.9, that is when e−0.002n = 0.1. Taking logarithms, 0.002n = ln 10, so n = 500ln 10 = 1151 seconds, about nineteen minutes.
Nine tenths has arrived when e−0.002n = 0.1, that is at n = 500ln 10 = 1151 seconds. 4.(b) Integrate the second thrust to a finite time in the same way: ∫0T2401 + 0.002ndn = [120000ln(1 + 0.002n)]0T = 120000ln(1 + 0.002T).
(b) The second design gives ∫0T2401 + 0.002ndn = 120000ln(1 + 0.002T). 5.At T = 106 that is 120000ln 2001 = 912000 millinewton-seconds, and at T = 108 it is 120000ln 200001 = 1465000. The answer has not settled; it has gone up by half as much again. A logarithm has no limit, so the second design has no total impulse: whatever total is asked for, it is reached eventually.
At a million seconds that is 912000 and at a hundred million 1465000: it has gone up by half as much again. 6.Check: both thrusts fall to nothing, so falling away is not what decides it. At T = 1016 the second design would have delivered about 3680000 millinewton-seconds and would still be climbing.
Both thrusts fall to nothing, so that is not what decides it. A logarithm has no limit, so the second design has no total impulse.
Answer: (a) the total impulse settles at 120000 millinewton-seconds, that is 120 newton-seconds, and nine tenths of it has arrived by 1151 seconds; (b) the second design gives about 912000 millinewton-seconds by a million seconds and about 1465000 by a hundred million, so it has no total impulse at all
Common mistakes
- Writing e−∞ = 0 straight into the antiderivative without the limit. The working comes out right here, but the same short cut applied to the second design gives ln∞, which is not a number, and a reader who has never written the limit down has nothing to look at when that happens. The limit is what tells the two cases apart.
- Arguing that the second thrust falls to zero, so its total must settle. Falling to zero is necessary and nowhere near enough: 2401 + 0.002n falls to zero and yet its total passes every figure you name. What matters is how fast the thrust falls, and a reciprocal falls far too slowly.