Cases that fit
Add the odd numbers in order and watch the totals. 1 = 1, then 1 + 3 = 4, then 1 + 3 + 5 = 9, then 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 16. Every total so far is a square: , , and .
Keep going and it keeps happening. The first five odd numbers add to , the first six to , and the first ten to .
Still a conjecture
The cases suggest a claim about every n: the first n odd numbers add to . Until an argument covers every n, it is a conjecture. Ten cases, or a million, leave infinitely many unchecked.
Patterns that hold for many cases can still fail. The number is prime for every n from 0 to 39: 41, 43, 47, 53 and so on. At n = 40 it is 1600 + 40 + 41 = 1681, which is 41 × 41.
Mark some points on a circle and join every pair with a straight chord, placing the points so that no three chords meet at one point inside. With 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 points the circle is cut into 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 regions, doubling every time. With 6 points there are 31 regions, not 32.
A square in L-shaped layers
The argument comes from building the square. Start with 1 dot, a 1 by 1 square. Wrap an L-shaped layer of 3 dots round two of its sides and it becomes 2 by 2. Another layer of 5 makes it 3 by 3, and a layer of 7 makes it 4 by 4.
Each layer turns a k − 1 by k − 1 square into a k by k square, so the layer holds the difference: . That is the kth odd number. Layer 1 holds 1, layer 2 holds 3, layer 3 holds 5, and layer 4 holds 7.
A 3 by 3 square. The 4 tinted dots are the first two layers, 1 + 3; the plain L of 5 dots is the third layer.
A 4 by 4 square. The 9 tinted dots are the first three layers, 1 + 3 + 5; the plain L of 7 dots is the fourth.
Every n at once
The layer count used nothing about a particular k. For every k, layer k holds 2k − 1 dots, and n layers build the n by n square. So for every n, and the conjecture is now a theorem.
Algebra gives the same result another way. The kth odd number is 2k − 1, so the first n of them add to 2(1 + 2 + … + n) − n. The sum 1 + 2 + … + n is , so the total is .
Once the result is proved, every particular case follows from it with no further work. The first 50 odd numbers add to , and the first 7 to 49, with nothing left to check.
What the special case assumed
A special case can hide an assumption. Suppose you check that if a > b then , using a = 5 and b = 3: 25 > 9. Every case you try with positive numbers agrees, and a proof built from them may quietly use that a and b are positive.
The general claim is false: 1 > −2, yet is less than . What was proved holds for positive numbers only. When an argument leans on a special case, ask what that case has that the general one lacks, such as a right angle, a positive sign or a whole number.
The usual mistakes
Calling a checked pattern proved. passed 40 checks before failing.
Writing the claim with letters and stopping there. "The first n odd numbers add to " states the claim for every n; it does not prove it.
Checking a proved result again for one case. Once the layers prove it for every n, the case n = 7 needs nothing more.
Proving a narrower claim than stated. An argument that works only for positive numbers proves the claim for positive numbers, whatever its first line says.
A training week and a spreadsheet
In the first application, two training plans suggest that a week’s total is 7 times the middle day, and naming the middle day m covers every plan at once. In the second, the first few entries of suggest 6 as the largest number dividing them all, and factoring proves it for every n.
Worked example: A Runner's Week That Adds 1 km Each Day, and Her Coach's Observations About the Total
Question A runner's training plan for a week has her run a whole number of kilometers on the first day and 1 km more on each day after that, for seven days. Her coach has noticed on past plans that the week's total is always 7 times the distance of the fourth day. (a) Prove the coach's observation for every such plan, and use it to find the first day's distance in a week that totals 91 km. (b) For a four-day plan built the same way, the coach guesses that the total is always a multiple of 4. Test the guess on two plans, then settle it for every four-day plan.
1.Test two plans first. The plan 1, 2, …, 7 totals 28 = 7 × 4, and the plan 5, 6, …, 11 totals 56 = 7 × 8. In each, 4 and 8 are the fourth day's distances, the middle of the week.
Two plans: 28 = 7 × 4 and 56 = 7 × 8, where 4 and 8 are the fourth days. 2.Now take every plan at once. Call the fourth day's distance m km. The seven days are m − 3, m − 2, m − 1, m, m + 1, m + 2 and m + 3.
Call the fourth day m km. The other days are m − 3 up to m + 3. 3.Pair the days around the middle: days 1 and 7 add to 2m, and so do days 2 and 6, and days 3 and 5. The three pairs and the middle day give 2m + 2m + 2m + m = 7m, which proves the observation for every plan.
Each day before the middle is short by what the matching day after it is over, so the total is 7m. 4.(a) A week of 91 km has 7m = 91, so m = 13 km on the fourth day and 13 − 3 = 10 km on the first. Check: 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 = 91.
(a) 7m = 91 gives m = 13, so the first day is 10 km. 5.Test the four-day guess: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10 and 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 = 26. Neither is a multiple of 4, and both leave a remainder of 2.
The four-day totals 10 and 26 both leave remainder 2 on division by 4. 6.(b) Prove what the tests show. With a km on the first day, the total is a + (a + 1) + (a + 2) + (a + 3) = 4a + 6 = 4(a + 1) + 2. That is a multiple of 4 plus 2, so every four-day total leaves remainder 2 on division by 4, and the guess is false for every four-day plan, not only the two tested.
(b) 4a + 6 = 4(a + 1) + 2: every four-day total leaves remainder 2, so the guess is false for every plan.
Answer: (a) The total is 7m, where m km is the fourth day's distance; the first day is 10 km; (b) the guess is false for every four-day plan: the total is 4(a + 1) + 2, which leaves remainder 2 on division by 4
Common mistakes
- Calling the observation proved because it held for the plans tried. Any number of examples covers only those plans; the total 7m covers every plan at once.
- Expecting the four-day total to be 4 times a middle day. Four days have no middle day: the middle falls between days 2 and 3, at a + 1.5 km, so the total is 4(a + 1.5) = 4a + 6, which is never a multiple of 4.
Worked example: Two Spreadsheet Columns Built from Powers of n, and the Largest Number That Divides Every Entry
Question A student fills a spreadsheet column with n3 − n for n = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and gets 6, 24, 60, 120 and 210. (a) Find the largest whole number that divides every entry n3 − n for every whole number n ≥ 2, and prove that it does. (b) A second column holds n5 − n. Use its first entries to find the largest whole number that could divide every entry, and prove that it divides n5 − n for every whole number n ≥ 2.
1.Factor the first expression: n3 − n = n(n2 − 1) = (n − 1)n(n + 1), the product of three consecutive whole numbers. Check with n = 5: 4 × 5 × 6 = 120.
n3 − n = (n − 1)n(n + 1), three consecutive whole numbers multiplied together. 2.Of any three consecutive whole numbers, one is a multiple of 3 and at least one is even, so their product is a multiple of 2 × 3 = 6 for every n.
One of three consecutive numbers is a multiple of 3 and at least one is even, so the product is a multiple of 6. 3.(a) Every entry is a multiple of 6, and the first entry is 6 itself, so no larger number divides every entry. The largest is 6.
(a) Every entry is a multiple of 6, and 6 itself is an entry: the largest is 6. 4.For n5 − n the first entries are 25 − 2 = 30, 35 − 3 = 240, 45 − 4 = 1020 and 55 − 5 = 3120. Their highest common factor is 30 = 2 × 3 × 5, and nothing larger can divide the entry 30, so 30 is the candidate.
The entries 30, 240, 1020 and 3120 have highest common factor 30. 5.Factor: n5 − n = n(n4 − 1) = (n − 1)n(n + 1)(n2 + 1). The first three factors make a multiple of 6, as before. For 5, take n by its remainder on division by 5. A remainder of 0, 1 or 4 makes n, n − 1 or n + 1 a multiple of 5. A remainder of 2 or 3 makes n2 + 1 a multiple of 5: (5q + 2)2 + 1 = 25q2 + 20q + 5 and (5q + 3)2 + 1 = 25q2 + 30q + 10.
Every remainder on division by 5 puts a factor 5 into one of the four brackets. 6.(b) Every entry n5 − n is a multiple of both 6 and 5, so of 30, and the entry 30 at n = 2 allows nothing larger. The largest whole number is 30.
(b) Every entry of n5 − n is a multiple of 6 × 5 = 30, and 30 is itself an entry: the largest is 30.
Answer: (a) 6, because n3 − n = (n − 1)n(n + 1) always has a factor 2 and a factor 3; (b) 30, because n5 − n = (n − 1)n(n + 1)(n2 + 1) also has a factor 5 for every remainder of n on division by 5
Common mistakes
- Answering 6 for the second column because the first column gave 6. The first entries of n5 − n have highest common factor 30, and the cases by remainder show that 5 divides every entry as well.
- Checking a few more entries and calling the result proved. The spreadsheet shows a candidate; only the factoring and the five remainder cases cover every n.