Comparison Tests for Series

Judge a series by a simpler one beside it.

Held under a convergent series

Comparison judges a series of non-negative terms against a simpler series whose behavior is already known, usually a p-series or a geometric series.

Suppose 0 ≤ aₙ ≤ bₙ for every n, and Σbₙ converges to B. The partial sums of Σaₙ climb, since no term is negative, and each one is at most the matching partial sum of Σbₙ, which is at most B. A total that climbs and never passes B settles on a limit, so Σaₙ converges, to at most B.

Held above a divergent series

The other direction: if 0 ≤ bₙ ≤ aₙ for every n and Σbₙ diverges, then Σaₙ diverges. The partial sums of Σbₙ grow past every number, and those of Σaₙ are at least as large.

So the inequality must point the right way for the verdict wanted. Below a convergent series proves convergence. Above a divergent series proves divergence.

An example of each

Σ 1/(n² + 1) converges. Its denominator is bigger than n², so each term is smaller than 1/n², and Σ 1/n² is a p-series with p = 2, which converges. The sum is less than π²/6, about 1.645; it is about 1.077.

Σ 1/√n diverges. For n ≥ 1, √n ≤ n, so 1/√n ≥ 1/n, and the harmonic series Σ 1/n diverges.

n

The terms 1/(n² + 1) for n = 1 to 6, with the vertical scale stretched: 1/2, 1/5, 1/10, 1/17, 1/26, 1/37. Each lies under the gold curve y = 1/x², at the matching term of Σ 1/n².

When the inequality points the wrong way

Take Σ 1/(2n − 1) = 1 + 1/3 + 1/5 + …. Since 2n − 1 ≥ n, each term is at most 1/n. But being smaller than a divergent series proves nothing: Σ 1/n² is smaller still and converges. That comparison is the wrong way round.

Choose the comparison the other way. Since 2n − 1 < 2n, each term is more than 1/(2n). And Σ 1/(2n) is half the harmonic series, which diverges. Now the inequality points the right way, and Σ 1/(2n − 1) diverges.

Sometimes no simple inequality points the right way. Take Σ 1/(n² − n + 1) = 1 + 1/3 + 1/7 + …. Its terms behave like 1/n², but since n² − n + 1 ≤ n², each is at least 1/n². Being bigger than a convergent series proves nothing.

The limit comparison test

Compare the sizes of the terms instead, by their ratio. If aₙ and bₙ are positive and aₙ/bₙ tends to a limit L with 0 < L < ∞, then Σaₙ and Σbₙ both converge or both diverge.

The reason: for large n the ratio is close to L, so it lies between L/2 and 2L. Then aₙ lies between (L/2)bₙ and 2L × bₙ. If Σbₙ converges, so does the series with terms 2L × bₙ, and Σaₙ is held under it. If Σbₙ diverges, so does the series with terms (L/2)bₙ, and Σaₙ is held above it. Direct comparison does the rest.

For Σ 1/(n² − n + 1) against 1/n², the ratio is n²/(n² − n + 1) = 1/(1 − 1/n + 1/n²), which tends to 1. So the series converges, like Σ 1/n².

A limit of 0 or infinity decides nothing by itself: it means the terms are of different sizes, and the comparison series was the wrong choice.

Choosing what to compare with

Keep the highest power of n in the top and in the bottom. In (2n + 1)/(n³ + 5) the top behaves like 2n and the bottom like n³, so the term behaves like 2n/n³ = 2/n². Compare with 1/n².

The ratio is (2n + 1)/(n³ + 5) × n² = (2n³ + n²)/(n³ + 5). Dividing the top and the bottom by n³ gives (2 + 1/n)/(1 + 5/n³), which tends to 2. Since 0 < 2 < ∞ and Σ 1/n² converges, Σ (2n + 1)/(n³ + 5) converges.

The same way, (n + 3)/(n² + 1) behaves like n/n² = 1/n. The ratio against 1/n is (n² + 3n)/(n² + 1), which tends to 1, and Σ 1/n diverges, so Σ (n + 3)/(n² + 1) diverges.

n

The ratio (2n + 1)/(n³ + 5) ÷ 1/n² for n = 1 to 10: 0.5, 1.54, 1.97, then just over 2, highest at about 2.12 when n = 6, and falling back toward the gold line at 2.

The usual mistakes

Comparing in the wrong direction: showing a series is smaller than a divergent one, or bigger than a convergent one. Neither proves anything.

Using direct comparison with negative terms. Each term of −1 − 1 − 1 − … is less than 1/n², and the series diverges. The test needs 0 ≤ aₙ.

Comparing with the wrong power. Against 1/n³, the ratio for (2n + 1)/(n³ + 5) tends to infinity; against 1/n, it tends to 0. Neither decides.

Reading a limit of 0 or infinity as a verdict. Only a finite, non-zero L lets the two series share their behavior.

Two aerials

In the application below, one aerial's harmonics are held under three times Σ 1/n², and the other's are held above the harmonic series, so one total is finite and the other is not.

Worked example: Two Aerials and the Power in Their Harmonics: One Total Finite, the Other Not

Question The power radiated by the nth harmonic of an aerial is Pn = 2n+1n3+n microwatts. A second aerial of another design radiates Qn = 2n+1n2+n microwatts in its nth harmonic. (a) Show that the first aerial's total power over all its harmonics is finite, and give an upper bound for it. (b) The second aerial must be switched off once its total passes 10 microwatts. How many harmonics does that take?

  1. 1.Compare Pn with a simpler term. For every n ≥ 1, 2n + 1 ≤ 3n and n3 + n ≥ n3, so Pn = 2n+1n3+n ≤ 3nn3 = 3n2.

    02468101204080120harmonics addedtotal power, microwattsfirst aerialP(n) is at most 3/(n x n)
    02468101204080120harmonics addedtotal power, microwattsfirst aerialP(n) is at most 3/(n x n)
    Every Pn ≤ 3n2, because 2n + 1 ≤ 3n and n3 + n ≥ n3.
  2. 2.The series ∑ 3n2 is three times the p-series with p = 2, which converges. By the comparison test a series of positive terms lying under the terms of a convergent series converges as well, so ∑ Pn converges.

    02468101204080120harmonics addedtotal power, microwattsbound 4.93first aerialP(n) is at most 3/(n x n)3 x pi x pi / 6 = 4.93
    02468101204080120harmonics addedtotal power, microwattsbound 4.93first aerialP(n) is at most 3/(n x n)3 x pi x pi / 6 = 4.93
    ∑ 3n2 = 3 × π26 = π22 ≈ 4.93 microwatts.
  3. 3.(a) The total power is finite, and it is at most 3 ∑ 1n2 = 3 × π26 = π22 ≈ 4.93 microwatts. Adding the first forty harmonics gives about 2.78 microwatts, comfortably inside that bound.

    02468101204080120harmonics addedtotal power, microwattsbound 4.93first aerial2.78P(n) is at most 3/(n x n)3 x pi x pi / 6 = 4.93forty harmonics: 2.78
    02468101204080120harmonics addedtotal power, microwattsbound 4.93first aerial2.78P(n) is at most 3/(n x n)3 x pi x pi / 6 = 4.93forty harmonics: 2.78
    (a) The first total is finite: forty harmonics give about 2.78 microwatts.
  4. 4.Turn to the second aerial. Here n2 + n = n(n+1) and 2n + 1 = n + (n+1), so Qn = 1n+1 + 1n, which is larger than 1n. The harmonic series diverges, so by the comparison test ∑ Qn diverges and its total passes every number.

    02468101204080120harmonics addedtotal power, microwattsbound 4.93second aerialfirst aerial2.78P(n) is at most 3/(n x n)3 x pi x pi / 6 = 4.93forty harmonics: 2.78Q(n) = 1/n + 1/(n + 1), above 1/n
    02468101204080120harmonics addedtotal power, microwattsbound 4.93second aerialfirst aerial2.78P(n) is at most 3/(n x n)3 x pi x pi / 6 = 4.93forty harmonics: 2.78Q(n) = 1/n + 1/(n + 1), above 1/n
    Qn = 1n + 1n+1 > 1n, and the harmonic series diverges.
  5. 5.(b) Add the terms until the total passes 10. The first is Q1 = 32 = 1.5 and the second is Q2 = 56, and the totals reach 9.99 microwatts after 136 harmonics and 10.01 microwatts after 137. The aerial is switched off after 137 harmonics.

    02468101204080120harmonics addedtotal power, microwattsbound 4.93switch off at 10second aerialfirst aerial2.7810.01P(n) is at most 3/(n x n)3 x pi x pi / 6 = 4.93forty harmonics: 2.78Q(n) = 1/n + 1/(n + 1), above 1/n137 harmonics reach 10.01
    02468101204080120harmonics addedtotal power, microwattsbound 4.93switch off at 10second aerialfirst aerial2.7810.01P(n) is at most 3/(n x n)3 x pi x pi / 6 = 4.93forty harmonics: 2.78Q(n) = 1/n + 1/(n + 1), above 1/n137 harmonics reach 10.01
    (b) The second aerial passes 10 microwatts after 137 harmonics.

Answer: (a) Finite: every Pn ≤ 3n2, so the total is at most π22 ≈ 4.93 microwatts; (b) 137 harmonics

Common mistakes

  • Comparing on the wrong side. To prove a series of positive terms converges, its terms must be bounded above by the terms of a convergent series, and to prove one diverges its terms must be bounded below by the terms of a divergent series. Showing that Pn ≥ 1n3 would prove nothing at all.
  • Judging Qn to converge because it looks like Pn with a smaller power. The power on the bottom is exactly what decides it: 2n+1n3+n behaves like 2n2 and converges, while 2n+1n2+n behaves like 2n and diverges.

More series and convergence problems, worked step by step →

Practice Comparison Tests for Series in the app